Hi
This will be a rather lengthy post, just to give the full (I hope) picture.
We're using Zabbix for monitoring and I'm having problems
understanding why the deletion of rows in the events table is so slow.
Zabbix: 4.2 (never mind the name of the db - it is 4.2)
new values per second: ~400
hosts: ~600
items: ~45000
OS: CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)
Postgresql was installed from the yum repo on postgresql.org
zabbix_34=> select version();
version
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 10.8 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623
(Red Hat 4.8.5-36), 64-bit
(1 row)
The database is analyzed + vacuumed nightly. The server runs Zabbix and the
database, has 16 GB memory, 4 vCPUs (modern hardware).
Some parameters:
shared_buffers = 3GB
work_mem = 10MB (I also tested with work_mem = 128MB - no difference)
effective_cache_size = 6 GB
effective_io_concurrency = 40
checkpoint_timeout = 5 min (default)
max_wal_size = 1 GB (default)
checkpoint_completion_target = 0.8
pg_wal is already on a separate device.
events table: ~25 million rows / 2.9 GB
event_recovery table: ~12 million rows / 550 MB
alerts table: ~600000 rows / 530 MB
Generally the database is quite snappy and shows no indication of problems. But
now I've seen that housekeeping of events is
very slow - a single (normally hourly) run can take more than one day to
finish, so events keep stacking up in the table. A typical slow
delete statement, from the postgres log:
postgresql-10-20190717-031404.log:2019-07-17 03:37:43 CEST [80965]: [4-1]
user=zabbix,db=zabbix_34,app=[unknown],client=[local]: LOG: duration:
27298798.930 ms statement: delete from events where (eventid between 5580621
and 5580681 or eventid between 5580689 and 5580762 or eventid between 5580769
and 5580844 or eventid between 5580851 and 5580867 or eventid between 5580869
and 5580926 or eventid between 5580933 and 5580949 or eventid between 5580963
and 5581024
--- 8< --- a lot of similar eventids snipped away -----
or eventid between 5586799 and 5586839 or eventid in
(5581385,5581389,5581561,5581563,5581564,5581580,5
581582,5581584,5581585,5581635))
I've analyzed the deletion of a single row in events. First, some table
information:
zabbix_34=> \d events
Table "zabbix.events"
Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
--------------+-------------------------+-----------+----------+-----------------------
eventid | numeric | | not null |
source | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
object | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
objectid | numeric | | not null | '0'::numeric
clock | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
value | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
acknowledged | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
ns | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
name | character varying(2048) | | not null | ''::character
varying
severity | integer | | not null | 0
Indexes:
"idx_29337_primary" PRIMARY KEY, btree (eventid)
"events_1" btree (source, object, objectid, clock)
"events_2" btree (source, object, clock)
"events_clk_3" btree (clock)
Referenced by:
TABLE "acknowledges" CONSTRAINT "c_acknowledges_2" FOREIGN KEY (eventid)
REFERENCES events(eventid) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE CASCADE
TABLE "alerts" CONSTRAINT "c_alerts_2" FOREIGN KEY (eventid) REFERENCES
events(eventid) ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE CASCADE
TABLE "alerts" CONSTRAINT "c_alerts_5" FOREIGN KEY (p_eventid) REFERENCES
events(eventid) ON DELETE CASCADE
TABLE "event_recovery" CONSTRAINT "c_event_recovery_1" FOREIGN KEY
(eventid) REFERENCES events(eventid) ON DELETE CASCADE
TABLE "event_recovery" CONSTRAINT "c_event_recovery_2" FOREIGN KEY
(r_eventid) REFERENCES events(eventid) ON DELETE CASCADE
TABLE "event_recovery" CONSTRAINT "c_event_recovery_3" FOREIGN KEY
(c_eventid) REFERENCES events(eventid) ON DELETE CASCADE
TABLE "event_suppress" CONSTRAINT "c_event_suppress_1" FOREIGN KEY
(eventid) REFERENCES events(eventid) ON DELETE CASCADE
TABLE "event_tag" CONSTRAINT "c_event_tag_1" FOREIGN KEY (eventid)
REFERENCES events(eventid) ON DELETE CASCADE
TABLE "problem" CONSTRAINT "c_problem_1" FOREIGN KEY (eventid) REFERENCES
events(eventid) ON DELETE CASCADE
TABLE "problem" CONSTRAINT "c_problem_2" FOREIGN KEY (r_eventid) REFERENCES
events(eventid) ON DELETE CASCADE
zabbix_34=> \d event_recovery
Table "zabbix.event_recovery"
Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
---------------+--------+-----------+----------+---------
eventid | bigint | | not null |
r_eventid | bigint | | not null |
c_eventid | bigint | | |
correlationid | bigint | | |
userid | bigint | | |
Indexes:
"event_recovery_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (eventid)
"event_recovery_1" btree (r_eventid)
"event_recovery_2" btree (c_eventid)
Foreign-key constraints:
"c_event_recovery_1" FOREIGN KEY (eventid) REFERENCES events(eventid) ON
DELETE CASCADE
"c_event_recovery_2" FOREIGN KEY (r_eventid) REFERENCES events(eventid) ON
DELETE CASCADE
"c_event_recovery_3" FOREIGN KEY (c_eventid) REFERENCES events(eventid) ON
DELETE CASCADE
zabbix_34=> \d alerts
Table "zabbix.alerts"
Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
---------------+-------------------------+-----------+----------+-----------------------
alertid | numeric | | not null |
actionid | numeric | | not null |
eventid | numeric | | not null |
userid | numeric | | |
clock | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
mediatypeid | numeric | | |
sendto | character varying(1024) | | not null | ''::character
varying
subject | character varying(255) | | not null | ''::character
varying
message | text | | not null | ''::text
status | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
retries | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
error | character varying(2048) | | not null | ''::character
varying
esc_step | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
alerttype | bigint | | not null | '0'::bigint
p_eventid | bigint | | |
acknowledgeid | bigint | | |
Indexes:
"idx_29120_primary" PRIMARY KEY, btree (alertid)
"alerts_1" btree (actionid)
"alerts_2" btree (clock)
"alerts_3" btree (eventid)
"alerts_4" btree (status)
"alerts_5" btree (mediatypeid)
"alerts_6" btree (userid)
"alerts_7" btree (p_eventid)
Foreign-key constraints:
"c_alerts_1" FOREIGN KEY (actionid) REFERENCES actions(actionid) ON UPDATE
RESTRICT ON DELETE CASCADE
"c_alerts_2" FOREIGN KEY (eventid) REFERENCES events(eventid) ON UPDATE
RESTRICT ON DELETE CASCADE
"c_alerts_3" FOREIGN KEY (userid) REFERENCES users(userid) ON UPDATE
RESTRICT ON DELETE CASCADE
"c_alerts_4" FOREIGN KEY (mediatypeid) REFERENCES media_type(mediatypeid)
ON UPDATE RESTRICT ON DELETE CASCADE
"c_alerts_5" FOREIGN KEY (p_eventid) REFERENCES events(eventid) ON DELETE
CASCADE
"c_alerts_6" FOREIGN KEY (acknowledgeid) REFERENCES
acknowledges(acknowledgeid) ON DELETE CASCADE
Let's look at what's in the tables for event 7123123:
zabbix_34=> select * from events where eventid=7123123;
eventid | source | object | objectid | clock | value | acknowledged | ns
| name | severity
---------+--------+--------+----------+------------+-------+--------------+---------+--------------------------------------+----------
7123123 | 3 | 0 | 27562 | 1525264196 | 1 | 0 |
1980875 | Cannot calculate trigger expression. | 0
(1 row)
zabbix_34=> select * from event_recovery where eventid=7123123;
eventid | r_eventid | c_eventid | correlationid | userid
---------+-----------+-----------+---------------+--------
7123123 | 7124371 | | |
(1 row)
zabbix_34=> select * from alerts where eventid=7123123;
alertid | actionid | eventid | userid | clock | mediatypeid | sendto | subject
| message | status | retries | error | esc_step | aler
ttype | p_eventid | acknowledgeid
---------+----------+---------+--------+-------+-------------+--------+---------+---------+--------+---------+-------+----------+-----
------+-----------+---------------
(0 rows)
All these queries execute well below 1 ms, using indexes.
Let's delete one row. See explain results here:
https://explain.depesz.com/s/aycf . 5 seconds to delete a single row, wow!
This shows that it is the foreign key constraints on event_recovery and alerts
that take a lot of time.
But why? I far as I can see, the delete is fully CPU bound during execution.
Deleting the corresponding row directly from event_recovery or alerts executes
in less than 0.1 ms.
Any ideas?
I've observed that alerts and event_recovery tables both have more than one
foreign key that references events, if that matters.
Regards
Kristian Ejvind
[cid:image8741bc.PNG@a93fb6bd.49ab6386]
Kristian Ejvind
Linux System Administrator
IT Operations | Technical Operations
Resurs Bank
Ekslingan 8
Box 222 09, SE-25467 Helsingborg
Mobil: +46 728571483
Växel: +46 42 38 20 00
E-post: kristian.ejv...@resurs.se<mailto:kristian.ejv...@resurs.se>
Webb: www.resursbank.se<http://www.resursbank.se>
