Re: Why could different data in a table be processed with different performance?

[Fabio Pardi]

On 28/09/18 21:51, Vladimir Ryabtsev wrote:
> > That means, if your block size was bigger, then you would have bigger space 
> > allocated for one single record.
> But if I INSERT second, third ... hundredth record in the table, the size 
> remains 8K.


> So my point is that if one decides to increase block size, increasing storage 
> space is not so significant, because it does not set minimum storage unit for 
> a row.
>
ah, yes, correct. Now we are on the same page.

Good luck with the rest of things you are going to try out, and let us know 
your findings.

regards,

fabio pardi

> vlad