Hello:

EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)
select * from (
SELECT posts.id, users.name, posts.content
FROM posts JOIN users ON posts.user_id = users.id
WHERE posts.user_id IN (SELECT friend_user_id FROM friends WHERE user_id =
1)

ORDER BY posts.id DESC
) as a
ORDER BY a.id DESC
LIMIT 10;

------


EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS)
select * from (
SELECT posts.id, users.name, posts.content
FROM posts JOIN users ON posts.user_id = users.id
WHERE posts.user_id IN (SELECT friend_user_id FROM friends WHERE user_id =
2)

ORDER BY posts.id DESC
) as a
ORDER BY a.id DESC
LIMIT 10;

2018-02-13 8:28 GMT-05:00 <mks...@keemail.me>:

> Hello,
>
> I have the following schema:
>
>     CREATE TABLE users (
>         id   BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
>         name TEXT      NOT NULL UNIQUE
>     );
>
>     CREATE TABLE friends (
>         user_id        BIGINT NOT NULL REFERENCES users,
>         friend_user_id BIGINT NOT NULL REFERENCES users,
>         UNIQUE (user_id, friend_user_id)
>     );
>
>     CREATE TABLE posts (
>         id      BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
>         user_id BIGINT    NOT NULL REFERENCES users,
>         content TEXT      NOT NULL
>     );
>     CREATE INDEX posts_user_id_id_index ON posts(user_id, id);
>
> Each user can unilaterally follow any number of friends. The posts table
> has a large number of rows and is rapidly growing.
>
> My goal is to retrieve the 10 most recent posts of a user's friends. This
> query gives the correct result, but is inefficient:
>
>     SELECT posts.id, users.name, posts.content
>     FROM posts JOIN users ON posts.user_id = users.id
>     WHERE posts.user_id IN (SELECT friend_user_id FROM friends WHERE
> user_id = 1)
>     ORDER BY posts.id DESC LIMIT 10;
>
> If the user's friends have recently posted, the query is still reasonably
> fast (https://explain.depesz.com/s/6ykR). But if the user's friends
> haven't recently posted or the user has no friends, it quickly deteriorates
> (https://explain.depesz.com/s/OnoG).
>
> If I match only a single post author (e.g. WHERE posts.user_id = 5),
> Postgres uses the index posts_user_id_id_index. But if I use IN, the index
> doesn't appear to be used at all.
>
> How can I get these results more efficiently?
>
> I've uploaded the schema and the queries I've tried to dbfiddle at
> http://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=postgres_9.6&fiddle=
> cf1489b7f6d53c3fe0b55ed7ccbad1f0. The output of "SELECT version()" is
> "PostgreSQL 9.6.5 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10)
> 4.9.2, 64-bit" for me.
>
> Thank you in advance for any insights, pointers or suggestions you are
> able to give me.
>
> Regards,
> Milo
>



-- 
Cordialmente,

Ing. Hellmuth I. Vargas S.
Esp. Telemática y Negocios por Internet
Oracle Database 10g Administrator Certified Associate
EnterpriseDB Certified PostgreSQL 9.3 Associate

Reply via email to