"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As we seem discussing developement in general, there is one > obstacle in the way of individual use of DSCMs - context diff > format as only one accepted.
Well, that's not a hard-and-fast rule, just a preference. At least for me, unidiff is vastly harder to read than cdiff for anything much beyond one-line changes. (For one-liners it's great ;-), but beyond that it intermixes old and new lines too freely.) That's not merely an impediment to quick review of the patch; if there's any manual patch-merging to be done, it significantly increases the risk of error. I don't recall that we've rejected any patches lately just because they were unidiffs. But I'd be sad if a large fraction of incoming patches started to be unidiffs. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings