[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'd suggest we have multiple checkpoints during the cycle. Checkpoint is >> a "patch queue blitz" where we stop developing and reduce the queue to >> nothing. Perhaps a two-week period where everybody helps reduce the >> queue, not just Tom and Bruce. Every outstanding patch gets told what >> they need to do in order to get it committed. FF is then just the last >> in a series of checkpoints. Suggest we do a checkpoint every 2 months. > > I like this idea ...
Don't we need to have a background writer process to gradually flush this data so that checkpoints aren't so massive? ;-) -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="acm.org" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];; http://linuxfinances.info/info/oses.html "If there are aliens, they use Lisp." --Edward Lasker, mutatis mutandi ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
