On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:00:59 +0200 Rafael Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > > > > +1. Shorter release cycles are maybe good for fancy GUI oriented > > applications, but not so good for DBMS. > > -- > > We are always 1 year back the main release. We are testing and planing > the move to 8.2 now, and it won't happen until desember. In a 6 month > cycle we will have to jump over every second release. Yes you would have to jump over every second release. I fail to see how this matters? I don't understand the argument. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > regards -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature