On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:00:59 +0200
Rafael Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> 
> > 
> > +1. Shorter release cycles are maybe good for fancy GUI oriented
> > applications, but not so good for DBMS.
> > --
> 
> We are always 1 year back the main release. We are testing and planing
> the move to 8.2 now, and it won't happen until desember. In a 6 month
> cycle we will have to jump over every second release.

Yes you would have to jump over every second release. I fail to see how
this matters? I don't understand the argument.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> regards


-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
                        UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to