On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:47:41 -0300 Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > In fact, I could see doing a "no-catalog-changes, no major patches
> > we don't already know about, 6-month release". It would reset our
> > cycle and get PL/proxy, DSM, clustered indexes, etc. out the
> > door. It could mean turning away patches which look attractive,
> > though, so the whole community has to be into this.
>
> Ah, you mean like we planned for 8.0 and failed, then for 8.1 and
> failed, then for 8.2 and failed, then for 8.3 and failed? I can
> definitely support that idea.
>
As I recall 8.0 and 8.1 actually went pretty well.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
