Dave Page wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Not so. The locale is Japanese_Japan, really. That's the only part
>> that's relevant for UTF16 encodings, which is what we use to do UTF8. We
>> specifically *don't* try to use Japanese_Japan.65001.
>
> Thats not what I mean. From a *usability* perspective, Hiroshi should
> see Japanese_Japan.65001 because he's selected UTF-8 in Japanese_Japan.
> He shouldn't see Japanese_Japan.932 because that definitely isn't what
> he selected.
I'l grant you that from a usbility perspective, he should see
Japanese_Japan. Not the .65001 part, though.
//Magnus
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
