On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 11:50 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote: > On 10/10/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IMO, the patch is reverted, and submitted for 8.4 or pgfoundry. > > Yes, reverting is an option Reverting is only an option if we need to solve a technical problem. If there is no problem then why would we revert it? The only argument I've seen for reverting the patch is that it broke a process. It's hard enough for Developers to get code in without a team of Anti-Developers trying to take it back out again. Perhaps we should have an anti-credits section in the release notes to allow all those who've managed to get work removed get full credit for their anti-efforts. :-) -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
