On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:58 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 08:20:45AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 17:38 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > > > On Monday 08 October 2007 16:29, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > > The whole contrib thing confuses a lot of users. Is it included, or > > > > isn't it? IMHO, that distinction need to be clear, and I thought we > > > > were working (if not actively then at least passively) to "retire" > > > > contrib, moving things either to core or to pgFoundry. Adding yet > > > > another important feature that's "just in contrib" is making things > > > > worse, not better. > > > > IMHO, of course ;-) > > > > > > > > > > +1. I felt the same way about pg_standby, which would have been far more > > > accessible for 8.2 users had it lived on pg_foundry. > > > > I think we should move a version of pg_standby to pg_foundry anyway, > > specifically to support 8.2 users. > > Are you saying you want two versions of pg_standby, one in contrbi and one > on pgfoundry, or are you saying we should take the one in contrib away?
I would prefer that we backported pg_standby into 8.2 contrib, so the solution is where people need it to be. If not... -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
