On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:12:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I see that libpq manufactures three different .def files, whereas the
> ecpg code is only making two. Is this OK or an oversight? I'm not
Not knowing what the third one is for I deliberately created only two.
If there is a reason for the 3rd I'lö surely add it.
> clear on the reason for the two different "MSVC" .def files in libpq.
>
> Also, do we actually care about supporting Borland builds of ecpg ---
> maybe we don't need the 'b' versions for ecpg?
Fine with me. Do we need it in libpq? Or else we could remove if
everywhere. Maybe someone's working on it.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
