Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's not fixing the problem, unless your proposal includes never
>> issuing any warnings at all, for anything.
> No warning for "*" because it is intentional, but warning for actual
> stop words.
No, you're focusing on one symptom not the problem. The problem is
that we've got user-visible behavior going on during what's effectively
a chance event, ie, a cache reload.
One possible real solution would be to tweak the dictionary APIs so
that the dictionaries can find out whether this is the first load during
a session, or a reload, and emit notices only in the first case.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
