Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm sorry to raise this now. The earlier proposal for "track_" wasn't > supported by anyone that I can see, even though we decided to change the > way the stats parameters were arranged on those earlier threads.
Well, there was at least one other person who liked "track" at the time: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-07/msg00996.php which gave it about as much support as any other alternative that was mentioned :-( While I don't have any strong objection to changing "track" to "monitor", I'm not enthused by the other parts of your proposal. In particular I do object to using "activity" for the variable that is specifically *not* associated with feeding pg_stat_activity. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
