Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> BTW, I'm sure this was discussed but I forgot the conclusion: should >> chr(0) throw an error?
> I think it should, yes. OK. Looking back, there was also some mention of changing chr's argument to bigint, but I'd counsel against doing that. We should not need it since we only support 4-byte UTF8, hence code points only up to 21 bits (and indeed even 6-byte UTF8 can only have 31-bit code points, no?). If Tatsuo can find official code-point mappings for any other MB encodings, +1 on supporting those too. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly