Tom Lane wrote:
We've had that hack in there for almost a month now, and no strange
behaviors have turned up in the buildfarm. So I'm inclined to think
it has served its purpose, and we should revert it before anyone else
comes to bogus conclusions about performance. This is particularly
the case since Andrew has worked up a pg_regress enhancement that would
let specific buildfarm animals still test the "off" setting if they
chose.
+1
I will commit the pg_regress change. There are several buildfarm client
changes in the queue - I will add a facility to take advantage of this
and get out a new release of the client.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
