On Wednesday 05 September 2007 12:01, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wednesday 05 September 2007 00:06, Tom Lane wrote: > >> BTW, on re-reading that, it seems a tad surprising to get an error right > >> there --- if postgres_fe.h or anything it includes were broken, then the > >> build should have failed earlier. Is the failure reproducible in > >> repeated tries? > > > > Yes. Just for giggles I played with the configure flags as well, but it > > always errors in that spot. > > Hmph. I checked the CVS logs and there haven't been any recent changes > that seem like they could be related. > > It might be worth getting gcc -E output and looking to see what that > part of netdb.h looks like after macro expansion. >
Sorry, my C-fu is lacking. My makefile claims it uses gcc -E, but I'm not sure how to get a look at results after macro expansion However... I looked again at the output of the make command on some ubuntu buildfarm members, and the results were different enough that I got suspicous of the flex/bison derived files in the snapshot, so I decided to build from cvs and that works fine. FWIW I am using flex 2.5.31 and bison 2.1, not sure what is used to produce the snapshots... -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings