Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Since I don't think that a datatype solution is the way to go,
>> I don't feel that we are as far away from an agreement as Bruce
>> is worried about.
> Well, from where I sit, there is one person saying give me the foot gun,
> and Heikki saying he wants a bullet-proof type system, and you and I are
> in the middle, so the big problem is I don't see a concensus forming,
> and we have been discussing this for a while.
The people who actually use tsearch2 seem to all have the same opinion ...
so I think we can't go too far in the bullet-proofing direction.
But I would like a design that is bulletproof in dump/reload scenarios,
and I think it's fair to question that aspect of the tsearch2 design
because we've seen many reports of people having trouble updating
databases that use tsearch2.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
