Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > I've started reading the GIT patch to see if I can help with the review. > > > As the patch stands, I tried to keep it as non-invasive as possible, > > with minimum changes to existing APIs. That's because in the winter we > > were discussing changes to the indexam API to support the bitmap index > > am, and also GIT. I wanted to just have a patch to do performance > > testing with, without getting into the API changes. > > Hmm, do say, doesn't it seem like the lack of feedback and the failed > bitmap patch played against final development of this patch? At this > point I feel like the patch still needs some work and reshuffling before > it is in an acceptable state. The fact that there are some API changes > for which the patch needs to be adjusted makes me feel like we should > put this patch on hold for 8.4. So we would first get the API changes > discussed and done and then adapt this patch to them.
As Heikki mentioned, this was discussed back in March/April with no movement. At this point we have at least a month until beta so please try to move it forward as much as possible. It isn't going to be any easier during 8.4. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
