Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > >> Methinks it should be: stats_<something>, so that people find it in the > >> same place as stats_query_string, which is still there. > > > Hum, but the order in postgresql.conf is arbitrary, right? > > I concur with Simon that it should have some relationship to > stats_query_string. However, stats_collection doesn't appeal to me > because that sounds like it would subsume stats_query_string (it seems > like a master control toggle, as stats_start_collector used to be). > Maybe something like stats_count_events?
stats_enable_counters, or just stats_counters? We should prefix it with "stats". I understand the verb issue, but putting the same prefix for the same module is more important --- effectively it is stats.collection. Someday we might even use dots so we can have multiple levels of detail, e.g. stats.block.accumulate or something like that. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings