Re: [HACKERS] Future of krb5 authentication

[Stephen Frost]

* Magnus Hagander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Certainly not "just minor adjustments", since we need to do dynamic
> loading and checking for the functions. That's the big one, which will

If we're supporting krb5 anyway, and shipping the bits that go along
with that, do we need to do dynamic loading and function checking?

        Thanks,

                Stephen

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature