"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:19:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Is there a reason to say anything beyond "use autovac"?
> There is; I know that things like web session tables aren't handled very > well by autovacuum if there are any moderately large tables (anything > that will take more than a few minutes to vacuum). Eventually we should > be able to accommodate that case with multiple workers, but we'll need a > mechanism to ensure that at least one worker doesn't get tied up in > large vacuums. And which part of that do you think isn't resolved in 8.3? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings