I wrote: > I'm going to generate a smaller test program showing this and file > a bug report at Red Hat.
Filed as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246509 in case anyone wants to track it. (I suspect the Red Hat kernel guys will just bounce it upstream, but that's their call not mine.) > In the mean time, it looks like we should assume EIDRM means EINVAL > on Linux, because AFAICS there is not actually anyplace in that code > that should return EIDRM; their data structure doesn't really have > any state that would justify returning such a code. Patch for this committed in all active branches. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
