Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >>>> Hm, another possibility: "synchronous_commit = off" > > >>>> Ooo, I like that. Any other takers? > > >>> Yea, I like that too but I am now realizing that we are not really > >>> deferring or delaying the "COMMIT" command but rather the recovery of > >>> the commit. GUC as full_commit_recovery? > >> > >> recovery is a bad word I think. It is related too closely to failure. > > > commit_stability? reliable_commit? > > What's wrong with synchronous_commit? It's accurate and simple.
That is fine too. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
