Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anything shorter than the shortest possible numeric representation can > implicitly be interpreted as some alternate compact representation. I already > had a patch that stored small integers in a single NumericDigit without any > numeric header at all.
That's getting well beyond the realm of reason IMHO. I doubt you can merge it with this proposal anyway --- how will you disambiguate from zero with a positive dscale ("0.00")? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings