Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anything shorter than the shortest possible numeric representation can
> implicitly be interpreted as some alternate compact representation. I already
> had a patch that stored small integers in a single NumericDigit without any
> numeric header at all.

That's getting well beyond the realm of reason IMHO.  I doubt you can
merge it with this proposal anyway --- how will you disambiguate from
zero with a positive dscale ("0.00")?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to