Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Well assuming we have any SQL-level support at all I think we should > >> strive to avoid these functions taking INTERNAL arguments. > > > That gets us down to just needing to worry about whether we like the > > SQL representation of configurations. Which is still a nontrivial > > issue, but at least it seems manageable on a timescale that's > > reasonable for 8.3. > > O.k. I am not trying to throw any cold water on this, but with the > limitations we are suggesting, does the patch gain us anything over just > leaving tsearch in contrib?
The idea is that common operations like searching and mapping dictionaries will be easier to do, but the more complex stuff will require catalog manipulations. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
