"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, it is summarized here: > > http://momjian.us/expire/TOAST/SUMMARY.html > > It made non-TOAST access 2x faster, but TOAST 7x slower, and that seemed > like a good compromise.
Is this still testing with all data fitting in RAM? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly