Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Given this, I propose we simply #ifdef out the SO_REUSEADDR on win32. > Anybody see a problem with this?
> (A fairly good reference to read up on the options is at > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms740621.aspx Hmm ... if accurate, that page says in words barely longer than one syllable that Microsoft entirely misunderstands the intended meaning of SO_REUSEADDR. It looks like SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE might be a bit closer to the standard semantics; should we use that instead on Windoze? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
