Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 21:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > > That should go away entirely; to me the main point of the separate > > > > wal-writer process is to take over responsibility for not letting too > > > > many dirty wal buffers accumulate. > > > > > > Yes > > > > > > > > > I'll make the agreed changes by next Wed/Thurs. > > > > I have seen no patch yet with the agreed changes. > > True, will be at least a few more days yet. > > I've got a few questions I'll post later today.
Again, I have seen no follup patch for this. I would keep it for 8.4 but I am unsure what the issue even is, so I am deleting this message. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
