"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> You keep saying that but I think it's wrong. There are trivial patches that >> were submitted last year that are still sitting in the queue. > > Um ... which ones exactly? I don't see *anything* in the current queue > that is utterly without issues
I didn't mean they were without issues. Only that they weren't complex patches requiring broad knowledge of many parts of the system. Anyways, I think we're well on our way to improving the situation so I don't want to drag out my negativity any longer. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
