Magnus Hagander wrote: > > As an example, how is patch information going to help us review HOT or > > group-item-index? There is frankly more information about these in the > > archives than someone could reasonable read. What someone needs is a > > summary of where we are now on the patches, and lots of time. > > > > FYI, Tom, Heikki, I need one of you to post the list of patches and > > where we think we are on each one, even if the list is imperfect. > > I think you just contradicted yourself. Information isn ot the problem, but > you need more information... > > I think this is a fairly clear indication that we do need a better way to > track this information.
No, my point is that 100% information is already available by looking at email archives. What we need is a short description of where we are on each patch --- that is a manual process, not something that can be automated. Tom has posted it --- tell me how we will get such a list in an automated manner. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
