-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
- --On Sunday, April 29, 2007 21:30:36 +0200 Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > not sure I fully agree here - I think we could do a bit better on the > "bug tracking front" but it is a bit unclear if we cn honestly sy that > "the current process" does not work or is not going to scale in the > future. Complex patches need time - sometimes much more time than a > release or even two release cycles - it's unclear if trying to get those > in more agressively (by having more commiters or applying them earlier) > might not actually cause more harm due to -HEAD getting less stable and > causing developers to spend time hunting regressions. re: -HEAD getting less stable ... we wouldn't be adding just anyone as a committer, only those that are trusted to know what they are doing ... even 'slapping in a patch', I would expect it to have some sort of preliminary review by *someone* with a bit of knowledge in that aspect of the code ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGNQrf4QvfyHIvDvMRAoUqAKDKZY8rThsQi1vTKeQgq/c4HPIyzQCfe9o2 2fHy763eMw/hxGrMnDwXnLM= =g6E8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
