Tom Lane wrote:
> > Why not enums? ;-)
>
> Well, macros is how we do it elsewhere for "char" system columns.
> I'm not sure we could rely on the behavior if we declared
> pg_type.typtype as an enum type ... and if we don't, there's not
> much point.
I was thinking C enums:
enum typtype_type {
TYPTYPE_BASE = 'b',
TYPTYPE_COMPOSITE = 'c',
TYPTYPE_DOMAIN = 'd',
TYPTYPE_ENUM = 'e',
TYPTYPE_PSEUDO = 'p'
};
I'm not sure if this is better.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
