> Without a switch, because both full page writes and > corresponding logical log is included in WAL, this will > increase WAL size slightly > (maybe about five percent or so). If everybody is happy > with this, we > don't need a switch.
Sorry, I still don't understand that. What is the "corresponding logical log" ? It seems to me, that a full page WAL record has enough info to produce a dummy LSN WAL entry. So insead of just cutting the full page wal record you could replace it with a LSN WAL entry when archiving the log. Then all that is needed is the one flag, no extra space ? Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
