Excellent. Once you're ready, fire it over and I'll test it on our config.
Doug On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 18:34 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 13:29 -0500, Doug Knight wrote: > > > I would preserve the existing trigger function as little t "-t", and > > maybe implement a catchup trigger function as big t "-T"? Set it up so > > that if the first attempt to find the WAL file postgres is currently > > requesting succeeds, skip over the trigger check. If the first attempt > > fails, then do your trigger check. That way, in the OCF script, the > > postmaster can be started, the trigger file set, and connection to the > > database looped on until it succeeds as an indication for when the > > database is up and available. I think that's cleaner than comparing a > > filename from a 'ps' command. Once I've completed the OCF script and > > done some testing, I'll forward it to you for you to review and see if > > you want to include it. > > I'm happy to do this, unless other objections. > > I'll be doing another version before feature freeze. >
