On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:24:36PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:14:07PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> I noticed something in src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c which > >>> worries me, namely that it ignores functions and views. > >> > >> What? > > > The "it" in question is, find_composite_type_dependencies() > > All that that's interested in is whether there are stored values of the > datatype somewhere. Views don't have any storage, and a function > definition doesn't either.
I see. Perhaps I've misunderstood what this thing was for, then. What is it that checks whether it's OK to change a composite type, then? Cheers, D -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
