Gregory Stark wrote: > You're still merging patches and reviewing patches by hand, without any of the > tools to, for example, view incremental changes in the branch, view the logs > of the branch, merge the branch into the code automatically taking into > account the known common ancestor. Instead of receiving a 20k patch without > any tools to work with it you would be given a branch name and be able to view > and merge it into the main branch using the tools.
I don't see this as a win. I understand the ability to see the patch as separate revisions by the user, but for patch application, we really need to see the diff -c of the entire patch. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
