CREATE FULLTEXT CONFIGURATION myfts LIKE template_cfg AS DEFAULT;
SELECT add_fulltext_config('myfts', 'template_cfg', True);
That's simple, but what about
CREATE FULLTEXT MAPPING ON cfgname FOR lexemetypename[, ...] WITH
dictname1[, ...];
?
SELECT create_fulltext_mapping(cfgname, '{lexemetypename[, ...]}'::text[],
'{dictname1[, ...]}'::text[]);
Seems rather ugly for me...
Functions maybe doesn't see efective, but user's cannot learn new syntax.
SELECT create_fulltext_mapping(cfgname, ARRAY['lex..','..'], ARRAY['...'])
is readable.
I agree so enhancing parser oabout not standard construct isn't good.
And function interface does not provide autocompletion and online help in
psql. \df says only types of arguments, not a meaning.
Yes, I miss better support function in psql too. But it's different topic. I
don't see reason why
\h cannot support better functions.
Nice a day
Pavel Stehule
_________________________________________________________________
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
http://messenger.msn.cz/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend