Gavin Sherry wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Comments, objections? Also, any thoughts about the names to use for
these new node types? As I commented last year, I'm not completely
happy with "TopPlan" because it won't actually be a subtype of Plan,
but I don't have a better idea. Also I'm unsure what to call the
cut-down RangeTblEntry struct; maybe RunTimeRangeTblEntry?
I think TopPlan is misleading. What about MetaPlan instead of TopPlan? I
think RunTimeRangeTblEntry is okay, though long. ExecRangeTblEntry?
Would ExecPlan be better? - matches ExecRangeTblEntry.
Cheers
Mark
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
