Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Woh. Peter, you realize one of the reasons we use StrNCpy as a macro is > for performance. I don't see strlcpy as a macro.
Huh? StrNCpy is a wrapper around strncpy(). Do you have reason to
think that strncpy() is especially tightly implemented on most
platforms?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
