"Gregory Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> OK, please propose some wording so at least we can get agreement on >> that. > > How about something open-ended like "arrange for updates that do not update > columns referenced by foreign keys from other tables to avoid being blocked by > locks from concurrent RI checks"
Hum. Reading back in the thread it seems what I wrote is basically equivalent to the wording Simon originally proposed. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
