On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 11:34:23AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: > > That's true, but I think it would be worthwhile to invert the switch to > > be --disable-thread-safety, since the number of people who don't > > understand the problem far outweigh the cost of the switch. > > I'd vote against that unless it were done only for Linux, and personally > I think a platform-dependent default for this might be unreasonably > confusing.
Well, it's already platform specific, Win32 removes the option altogether (apparently). Which would be another option. However, it only trips people up occasionally, so I'm not going to push it. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
