On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:25:50PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > >BTW, this is a perfect example of why it's not a good idea to allow > >minor regression failures to go unfixed --- people become desensitized. > >I know I've been completely ignoring ECPG-Check buildfarm results > >for awhile now.
I was aware of this Tom, but didn't find the time to dig into it yet. > there was also some discussion off-list last week with Michael - I have > arranged for an account on that box for him but I'm not sure if he > already found time to investigate. I did today. This seemed like a strange one, but apparantly a gcc ABI-bug workaround interfered with the compiler used here because the workaround wasn't covering all positions. make check now gives a full list of OKs on Stefan's machine. Thanks for the account. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
