Tino Wildenhain wrote: > Bruce Momjian schrieb: > > Hannu Krosing wrote: > >> Officially by who ? > >> > >> 2.3 was the first version to introduce bool as a subtype of int, in > >> 2.2.3 True and False were introduced as two variables pointing to > >> integers 1 and 0. > >> > >> So to make your patch ok on all python versions, just make it > >> conditional on python version being 2.3 or bigger, and return int for > >> pre-2.3. > > > > I thought about suggesting that, but do we want plpython to have > > different result behavior based on the version of python used? I didn't > > think so. > > Why not? Python2.2 is rarely in use anymore and users of this would get > the same behavior. Users of python2.3 and up would get the additionally > cleaned boolean interface - also users which go the from __future__ > import ... way. Thats how python works and develops forth and we should > not work against that from postgres side. > > So I'm indeed +1 for conditional approach.
Fine if people think that is OK. Please submit a patch that is conditional on the python version. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
