Andrew Dunstan wrote: > We should error out on any explicit encoding that conflicts with the > client encoding. I don't like the idea of just ignoring an explicit > encoding decl.
That is an instance of the problem of figuring out which encoding names are equivalent, which I believe we have settled on finding impossible. > Are we going to ensure that what we hand back to another client has > an appropriate encding decl? Or will we just remove it in all cases? We can't do the former, but the latter might be doable. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
