On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 09:09 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list > > and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists? > > > > AIUI, the hold list is those patches providing new features that were > held over between 8.2 feature freeze and 8.2 branch. Since they have > been around for a while I think they have some claim to priority. The > other list is just the normal running list of such patches that Bruce keeps.
OK. Makes sense, thanks. > > There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show > > up on either list. Hopefully the priority applies to all things that should be on the list. > That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not happen > would be to auto-process all patch submissions. Sounds a good idea. Patch farm anyone? Auto apply/make check? -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
