* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
> > much.  This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
> > licenses.  You're welcome to your own interpretation.
> 
> That was my point --- that it isn't clear what "additional restrictions"
> are, and that an advertizing clause or additional license can be
> interpreted as the same thing.

The point, from Debian's perspective anyway, is that they're *not* the
same thing and one is an 'additional restriction' while the other isn't.
It's pretty clear that the GPL has a clause requiring the distribution
of the license associated with the work while it has no clause which
requires statements in advertising material.

        Thanks,

                Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to