On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 05:40:12PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think another point you need to bring out more clearily is that > > the community is also often "miffed" if they feel they have been > > left out of the design and testing phases. This is sometimes just > > a reflex that is not always based on technical reasoning. Its just > > that as you correctly point out are worried of being "high-jacked" > > by companies. > > I hate to mention an emotional community reaction in this document.
You don't have to name it that if you don't want to, although respect (or at least a good simulation of it) is crucial when dealing with any person or group. Handing the community a /fait accompli/ is a great way to convey disrespect, no matter how well-meaning the process originally was. > We normally just highlight the inefficiency of a company doing > things on their own, and the wasted effort of them having to make > adjustments. Would it really hurt to touch on some of the "whys" of this? Cheers, D -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
