At 10:45 AM 12/15/2006, Tom Lane wrote:
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are various attempts at providing better timing infrastructure at low
> overhead but I'm not sure what's out there currently. I expect to
do this what
> we'll have to do is invent a pg_* abstraction that has various
implementations
> on different architectures.
You've got to be kidding. Surely it's glibc's responsibility, not ours,
to implement gettimeofday correctly for the hardware.
regards, tom lane
I agree with Tom on this. Perhaps the best compromise is for the pg
community to make thoughtful suggestions to the glibc community?
Ron Peacetree
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
