"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Short version: is it optimal for vacuum to always populate reltuples
> with live rows + dead rows?
If we didn't do that, it would tend to encourage the use of seqscans on
tables with lots of dead rows, which is probably a bad thing.
> Is there any way to encourage those dead rows to go away,
Close your open transactions.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
