"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 01:49:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> This is exactly the slippery slope I don't care to start down.
> I guess I'm confused as to how this is any different from other > functions where we've provided multiple input arguments, such as the > aggregate functions. The salient reason is that the spec only defines width_bucket for numeric input arguments, whereas stuff like max/min is defined *by the spec* for other data types. Since there's no spec-based argument for allowing width_bucket for other datatypes, and only an (IMHO) very weak use-case for it, I don't think we should add the clutter. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match